This issue is preventing our website from loading properly. Please review the following troubleshooting tips or contact us at [email protected].
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
Your guide to the most important world stories of the day
Essential analysis of the stories shaping geopolitics on the continent
The latest news, analysis, and data from the country each week
Weekly update on what’s driving U.S. national security policy
Evening roundup with our editors’ favorite stories of the day
One-stop digest of politics, economics, and culture
Weekly update on developments in India and its neighbors
A curated selection of our very best long reads
Report: What if Hamas Doesn’t Release the Hostages by Trump’s Inauguration?
Create an FP account to save articles to read later.
Sign Up
ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN
Downloadable PDFs are a benefit of an FP subscription.
Subscribe Now
ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN
Gifting articles is a subscriber benefit.
Subscribe Now
ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN
This article is an Insider exclusive.
Contact us at [email protected] to learn about upgrade options, unlocking the ability to gift this article.
Print Archive
See All
Follow FP on X
Follow FP on LinkedIn
Follow FP on Instagram
Follow FP on Facebook
Follow FP on X
Follow FP on LinkedIn
Follow FP on Instagram
Follow FP on Facebook
Foreign Policy Magazine is a division of Graham Holdings Company. All contents (c) 2024, Graham Digital Holding Company. All rights reserved. Foreign Policy, 655 15th St NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20005.
News, analysis, and background on the ongoing conflict
MORE ON THIS TOPIC
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump warned in December that there will be “hell to pay” if hostages held by Hamas in Gaza are not released by his inauguration on Jan. 20.
Trump echoed this warning during a press conference on Tuesday, stating that “all hell will break out in the Middle East” if the hostages aren’t returned by the time that he takes office. “It will not be good for Hamas. And it will not be good, frankly, for anyone,” Trump said.
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump warned in December that there will be “hell to pay” if hostages held by Hamas in Gaza are not released by his inauguration on Jan. 20.
Trump echoed this warning during a press conference on Tuesday, stating that “all hell will break out in the Middle East” if the hostages aren’t returned by the time that he takes office. “It will not be good for Hamas. And it will not be good, frankly, for anyone,” Trump said.
But the president-elect hasn’t elaborated on what this means or detailed what steps he would take if this deadline were not met. Trump’s team did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Foreign Policy on his recent remarks surrounding a Gaza hostage deal.
Trump’s warnings to Hamas come amid one of the most transformative and chaotic periods for the Middle East in recent history and raise questions about how involved the president-elect is willing to get in the region after pledging “no new wars” on the campaign trail.
“Trump’s threat is designed to convince Hamas that it’s more likely to get a better deal with the outgoing Biden administration than with the incoming Trump administration, and so it should make one now,” Jonathan Panikoff, who served as the deputy national intelligence officer for the Near East at the National Intelligence Council from 2015 to 2020, told Foreign Policy.
“While there are limited avenues of additional pressure the Trump administration can put on Hamas in Gaza aside from supporting more Israeli strikes in the strip, much of Hamas’s current leadership is external to Gaza, and the Trump administration could seek to apply additional sanctions on them and their families to try to increase pressure,” added Panikoff, who is now the director of the Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative at the Atlantic Council.
By setting a hard deadline of Jan. 20 for the release of the hostages, Trump is trying to “put more pressure on the process” and “create a sense of urgency,” retired Gen. Joseph Votel, who oversaw U.S. military operations in the Middle East from 2016 to 2019 as commander of U.S. Central Command, told Foreign Policy.
Votel, who is now a distinguished senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, said it’s unlikely that Trump would turn to U.S. military power as a solution if the Israel-Hamas war is still raging on Inauguration Day. Trump could increase support for Israeli military activities in Gaza to ramp up pressure on Hamas, Votel said, but with the “level of destruction” already seen in the enclave, “it’s hard to see what more might be done.”
One possible step that Trump could take is to support Israel imposing increased restrictions on humanitarian assistance into the enclave, as one close associate of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has called for. However, this would likely lead to both domestic and international criticism, and it might not sway Hamas one way or another.
“If Hamas were worried about the suffering of Gazans, this would have been settled a long time ago. Its leaders are not concerned about the suffering—they exploit it,” said Dennis Ross, a former U.S. envoy to the Middle East, in an interview with Foreign Policy. “Even if President Trump gives Israel more of a free hand and does not pressure it on humanitarian assistance, it is not clear how much that will affect Hamas leaders in Gaza.”
Israelis want the fighting to end but their leaders don’t.
|
U.S.-led diplomatic talks were essentially a performance, doomed from the outset.
|
For a leader with fewer conservative bona fides, such a bold diplomatic initiative would be politically untenable.
|
For more than a year, international negotiators have repeatedly failed to secure a hostage release and a truce deal between Israel and Hamas. Mediators from the United States, Qatar, and Egypt are currently in Doha, Qatar, to continue talks aimed at finally reaching an agreement.
On Thursday, U.S. President Joe Biden, whose administration is racing to secure a cease-fire deal before he leaves the White House, expressed cautious optimism that a truce could be close. “We’re making some real progress,” Biden told reporters at the White House. “I’m still hopeful that we’ll be able to have a prisoner exchange.”
Steve Witkoff, whom Trump has tapped to be his special envoy to the Middle East, arrived in Doha on Friday to join the talks. At a press conference in Mar-a-Lago earlier in the week, Witkoff said negotiators were “making a lot of progress.”
“I’m really hopeful that by the inaugural, we’ll have some good things to announce on behalf of the president,” Witkoff said.
Despite this positive messaging, there are no guarantees that a deal will be reached by Jan. 20.
“It is probably slightly better than 50-50 right now for a deal. Many of the obstacles that existed before still remain—Hamas still wants some assurance before they accept a phased approach that the war will end, and Prime Minister Netanyahu still does not want to give that assurance,” said Ross, who is now a distinguished fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
The issue of how many living hostages Hamas will release also remains a big sticking point in the talks, as well as the number of Palestinian prisoners the militant group is demanding that Israel release in return.
“Still, the reason I put the deal at somewhat better than 50-50 is [that] there is a Trump effect,” Ross said, adding, “Hamas may want to do the deal shortly before Jan. 20, with the belief that if there is a cease-fire before he comes in, President Trump won’t want to see a renewal of the war after he is in office. Moreover, I think Hamas is under somewhat greater pressure from Qatar, Egypt and maybe also Turkey—all trying to show Trump they are pressing and delivering what he wants.”
Another question hanging over Trump’s push for a hostage deal is whether Netanyahu, who has faced fierce criticism from families of hostages and been accused of hampering cease-fire talks, will be an obstacle. Netanyahu and Trump have historically been close allies, but the Israeli prime minister is also trying to keep his fragile coalition government together—and far-right members have threatened to bring it down if he accepts a cease-fire deal.
Trump’s Jan. 20 deadline “probably does not mean much to Netanyahu so long as he’s not viewed as being the impediment to a deal,” said Panikoff, the former National Intelligence Council official. “If Hamas actually signs off on a deal, then the pressure will shift to Prime Minister Netanyahu, because he will do almost anything—short of collapsing his coalition—to ensure he begins the second Trump term in good graces with the president-elect,” he added.
John Haltiwanger is a reporter at Foreign Policy. X: @jchaltiwanger
Commenting on this and other recent articles is just one benefit of a Foreign Policy subscription.
Already a subscriber? Log In.
Subscribe Subscribe
View Comments
Join the conversation on this and other recent Foreign Policy articles when you subscribe now.
Subscribe Subscribe
Not your account? Log out
View Comments
Please follow our comment guidelines, stay on topic, and be civil, courteous, and respectful of others’ beliefs.
The default username below has been generated using the first name and last initial on your FP subscriber account. Usernames may be updated at any time and must not contain inappropriate or offensive language.
Israelis want the fighting to end but their leaders don’t.
|
U.S.-led diplomatic talks were essentially a performance, doomed from the outset.
|
For a leader with fewer conservative bona fides, such a bold diplomatic initiative would be politically untenable.
|
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
✓ Signed Up
You’re on the list! More ways to stay updated on global news:
✓ Signed Up
✓ Signed Up
✓ Signed Up
✓ Signed Up
✓ Signed Up
As Trump returns to office, the question is whether change will come at the negotiating table or on the battlefield.
Loudly making threats doesn’t amount to a foreign policy.
The biggest releases in foreign affairs, history, and economics.
From Moldova to Mexico, these conflicts are currently flying under the radar but could emerge as major flash points.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FP’s flagship evening newsletter guiding you through the most important world stories of the day, written by Alexandra Sharp. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
✓ Signed Up
Specialty rates for students and faculty.
Lock in your rates for longer.
Unlock powerful intelligence for your team.
Follow FP on X
Follow FP on LinkedIn
Follow FP on Instagram
Follow FP on Facebook
Follow FP on X
Follow FP on LinkedIn
Follow FP on Instagram
Follow FP on Facebook
Foreign Policy Magazine is a division of Graham Holdings Company. All contents (c) 2024, Graham Digital Holding Company. All rights reserved. Foreign Policy, 655 15th St NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20005.